<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for subvisual</title>
	<atom:link href="http://subvisual.net/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://subvisual.net</link>
	<description>busy days, full head… must write this stuff down.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 19:05:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on my delicious.com tags rerefreshed by Ted Penner</title>
		<link>http://subvisual.net/ideas/my-delicious-com-tags-rerefreshed/comment-page-1/#comment-634</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Penner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 19:05:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://subvisual.net/?p=174#comment-634</guid>
		<description>Hi,
I have read through your page but am not sure I completely understand it.  I want to take my bookmarks out of delicious and have the tags become folders in something else (IE or FF).  It makes no difference to me which browser gets them at this stage.  Is there an easy way to accomplish this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
I have read through your page but am not sure I completely understand it.  I want to take my bookmarks out of delicious and have the tags become folders in something else (IE or FF).  It makes no difference to me which browser gets them at this stage.  Is there an easy way to accomplish this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The HTML5 and Adobe Flash debate resolved: use the right tool for the job by Jeron Kuxhausen</title>
		<link>http://subvisual.net/ideas/the-html5-and-adobe-flash-debate-resolved-use-the-right-tool-for-the-job/comment-page-1/#comment-428</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeron Kuxhausen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 17:39:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://subvisual.net/?p=205#comment-428</guid>
		<description>I honestly think Adobe needs to split flash into two entities. Flash is a very powerful tool but it has a lot of flaws and is a huge cpu burden. First they need to make it more efficient. Second I think they need to take original flash and gear it more towards animation like toon boom which is just animation, then take their new program flash catalyst and make that the more web oriented one but support HTML5 and allow you to publish for HTML5 cause we are in a world where you have to design for wide wide audiences and what platforms we design for are a choice we have to make just like we&#039;ve always had to choose who our designs want to hit and attract. With flash as animation, and catalyst more towards web and interactivity I think they could work more on efficiency and with the two together you could still make good interactive web games or device apps. Overall I applaud Apple on it&#039;s innovation and they know that we are a mobile generation, no one wants to be tied down to a desk, we want stuff now and we want to do a lot of things at once. But Adobe is refusing to accept that maybe flash isn&#039;t the full answer. I know flash will not ever &quot;die&quot; but to change it and evolve it is only natural right? So recap Flash=Animation(like toon boom) Catalyst=Web and interactivity with support for open source web standards. I just wish someone could talk to adobe :/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I honestly think Adobe needs to split flash into two entities. Flash is a very powerful tool but it has a lot of flaws and is a huge cpu burden. First they need to make it more efficient. Second I think they need to take original flash and gear it more towards animation like toon boom which is just animation, then take their new program flash catalyst and make that the more web oriented one but support HTML5 and allow you to publish for HTML5 cause we are in a world where you have to design for wide wide audiences and what platforms we design for are a choice we have to make just like we&#8217;ve always had to choose who our designs want to hit and attract. With flash as animation, and catalyst more towards web and interactivity I think they could work more on efficiency and with the two together you could still make good interactive web games or device apps. Overall I applaud Apple on it&#8217;s innovation and they know that we are a mobile generation, no one wants to be tied down to a desk, we want stuff now and we want to do a lot of things at once. But Adobe is refusing to accept that maybe flash isn&#8217;t the full answer. I know flash will not ever &#8220;die&#8221; but to change it and evolve it is only natural right? So recap Flash=Animation(like toon boom) Catalyst=Web and interactivity with support for open source web standards. I just wish someone could talk to adobe :/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Selecting a framework for JavaScript and Ajax development by yui drag drop in bounds</title>
		<link>http://subvisual.net/ideas/selecting-a-framework-for-javascript-and-ajax-development/comment-page-1/#comment-181</link>
		<dc:creator>yui drag drop in bounds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 17:57:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://subvisual.net/?p=14#comment-181</guid>
		<description>Ext-Js and YUI,  in my impression, are in the same level. Ext-Js may be marginally advisable written, but YUI more best documented. When  was called to opt within YUI and Ext-Js, YUI is closer selection, due to finer support, many demos and documentations. In opposite incline, as you will assure afterward YUI and Ext-Js are real identical, thusly YUI demos and models sometimes can be expedient for Ext-js writing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ext-Js and YUI,  in my impression, are in the same level. Ext-Js may be marginally advisable written, but YUI more best documented. When  was called to opt within YUI and Ext-Js, YUI is closer selection, due to finer support, many demos and documentations. In opposite incline, as you will assure afterward YUI and Ext-Js are real identical, thusly YUI demos and models sometimes can be expedient for Ext-js writing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Pod Camps Bay. Luxury boutique hotel website. by Trevor</title>
		<link>http://subvisual.net/work/pod-camps-bay-luxury-boutique-hotel-website/comment-page-1/#comment-82</link>
		<dc:creator>Trevor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 14:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://subvisual.net/?p=170#comment-82</guid>
		<description>Yo Ad, great working you again! 
Later... 
midnight perhaps... 
Haha.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yo Ad, great working you again!<br />
Later&#8230;<br />
midnight perhaps&#8230;<br />
Haha.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Playful09 by Playful &#8216;09 &#8211; Roo Reynolds</title>
		<link>http://subvisual.net/ideas/playful09/comment-page-1/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>Playful &#8216;09 &#8211; Roo Reynolds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 21:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://subvisual.net/?p=111#comment-49</guid>
		<description>[...] people who have written about it: Suw Charman-Anderson, Leila Johnston, Howard Pull, Adam Davis, &#8230;  October 31, 2009 &#124; conferences, films, fun, games, presentations &#124; 4 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] people who have written about it: Suw Charman-Anderson, Leila Johnston, Howard Pull, Adam Davis, &#8230;  October 31, 2009 | conferences, films, fun, games, presentations | 4 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
